How Many People Die Each Year From Drunk Driving?

How Many People Die Each Year From Drunk Driving? 

Every year, drunk drivers cause the deaths of 11,654 people, putting the lives of innocent people at risk. It is estimated that 121 million people drink and drive, or 300,000 times per day. Although only 1% of these drivers are ever arrested, most drivers will run into a drunk driver at some point during their daily lives. 

(Looking for a Car Accident Lawyer? Contact us Today! Click here: Pedestrian Vehicle Accident Attorney)

Statistics on drunk driving 

Drunk driving is a major cause of fatalities and injuries, and statistics indicate that over 50% of highway car crashes involve drunk drivers. In addition, approximately 74,000 people sustain serious injuries in alcohol-related car crashes each year. However, these statistics can differ depending on the year and state. For example, the statistics for 2016 show that 1,233 people died as a result of drunk driving. Of these, 29% of them were children. 

BAC (blood alcohol concentration) is one of the most important measures of how drunk a driver is. A driver with a blood alcohol level of 0.08% or higher is three times more likely to be involved in a fatal crash than a sober driver. In addition, drunk drivers are more likely to kill pedestrians and bicyclists. While drunk driving is illegal in all 50 states, it is still a leading cause of fatal accidents. 

Cost of drunk driving 

If you are arrested for drunk driving, the cost can be staggering. Depending on the state you live in, the cost of a DUI can cost you anywhere from eight to ten thousand dollars. The fine alone can triple your insurance rate, and there are court fees and attorney fees that can add up to two thousand dollars. 

Medical expenses are also a huge part of the cost of a DUI. A drunk driver is likely to cause injuries to innocent bystanders. These injuries may require minor medical attention at the scene, but more serious injuries may require hospitalization or surgery. In severe cases, they could result in permanent disability or even death. 

Rate of repeat offenders 

Recent studies show that a third of the people involved in fatal car accidents are repeated, drunk drivers. The study also found that repeat drunk drivers were 4.5 times more likely to be impaired while driving than first-time offenders. They were also 16% more likely to test positive for alcohol or drugs. This increase in the number of repeat offenders is concerning. It calls for a more comprehensive approach to preventing the recurrence of drunk driving. 

The study also noted that repeat drunk driving offenders were older and male than first-time offenders. They also had shorter lapses in time between offenses. In addition, repeat DUI offenders were more likely to be married than first-time offenders. 

Millennials most at-risk for drinking and driving 

According to the Trust for America’s Health, Millennials are among the most likely age groups to drink and drive. In addition, the CDC found that millennials are the most likely age group to die due to drug and alcohol abuse. The definition of millennials is generally people born from 1981 to 1996, although some definitions expand the group to include people born up to the year 2000. 

In a recent study, AAA found that young millennials are most likely to engage in risky driving behaviors than the average teen. Nearly half of young millennials admitted to using their cell phone while driving. The research also found that many of them engage in aggressive driving, running red lights, and texting while driving. 

Age of repeat offenders 

The average age of repeat DUI offenders is slightly older than that of first-time offenders. Offenders are also more likely to be male and married. The majority of repeat DUI offenders have a prior history of drunk driving or drug use. This study provides some interesting statistics about repeat offenders. 

While the overall number of repeat offenders who die from drunk driving is low, it still represents a significant number of deaths. However, the study was limited by the fact that it was based on data collected from only 3 counties in rural Kentucky. The sample size is relatively small, making the results vulnerable to undetected relationships. The sample was also subject to missing data due to a random process of pairwise deletion.